Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Psychology 404: Encountering Bias (Class Activity)

Bias and Discrimination: Sources and Consequences
Stephanie Cardenas
Fall 2021

Compare & Contrast

                          

ProQuest History

Instructions

ARTICLE: Making space for fat bodies? : A critical account of 'the obesegenic environment' by Rachel Colls & Bethan Evans (December, 2014)

ABSTRACT:

A key focus for geographical and policy work on obesity has involved interrogating the concept of an ‘obesogenic environment’ – an environment with particular physical, social and economic characteristics considered to contribute towards the propensity of bodies to be or to become obese/fat. Alongside this, Critical Geographies of Obesity/Fatness challenge the classification of fat bodies as diseased and in need of intervention by drawing attention to the politics surrounding the governance of fatness and the multiple experiences of body size. In this article, we place these strands of geographical work alongside each other in order to develop Critical Geographies of Obesogenic Environments. In so doing, we not only set out the main tenets of work in geography on obesity/fatness but also raise specific questions about how bodies, environments and body-environment interactions have been conceptualized and researched. We do so in order to develop and present three research trajectories for Critical Geographies of Obesogenic Environments which will allow geographical research to engage within obesity/fatness more carefully, reflexively and critically. Specifically, this involves: redefining obesogenic environments not as environments that make bodies fat, but as environments that make fat bodies problematic; engaging sensitively with the multiplicities of fat embodied experience; and considering alternative theoretical frameworks in order to avoid the pitfalls of environmental determinism.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Find a partner (or two!) with a different colored poker chip. Take 5 minutes to look at your assigned article records (left) and discuss the similarities and differences between the records, paying special attention to the descriptive terminology attached to each record (may be referred to as: keywords, subjects, classification, identifier).

ASK:

  • Where is each article from? Database? Catalog? Other resource?
  • What is a database? What makes a database different from other research tools, like the library catalog or Google?
  • What differences in descriptive terminology do you notice between records? What reasons might be behind these differences?
  • Why is it important to notice differences between separate records for the same article?